Fix GOOPS post.

Thanks to mfiano on IRC for pointing out the error.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/posts/2022-10-05-goops-issues.md b/posts/2022-10-05-goops-issues.md
index b0e4266..d4eab3e 100644
--- a/posts/2022-10-05-goops-issues.md
+++ b/posts/2022-10-05-goops-issues.md
@@ -296,17 +296,8 @@ documentation for a generic.  One complicating factor is that
 `generic-function-name` and `generic-function-methods` are defined in
 libguile, which is C, not Scheme.  I don't know if this hypothetical
 `generic-function-documentation` would have to be in C, too.
-
-In CLOS, methods do not accept documentation strings, only generics
-do.  The downside of doing the same is that most code using GOOPS that
-I've seen does not use `define-generic` for every generic procedure,
-because `define-method` will create the generic procedure if needed.
-So, it would mean adding a `define-generic` form for every generic
-function that should be documented.  Would it make sense to allow
-documentation strings for methods, too?  The documentation for a
-generic could then be the union of its own documentation and any of
-its methods that have documentation.  There's probably a reason why
-CLOS doesn't do this and it would be best to understand that first.
+`defmethod` also accepts documentation strings, but Guile’s
+`define-method` does not.
 
 ## Generics cannot be merged outside of a module